Croobert News: Ellen Brown: Time to Break Up the Too-Big-to-Fail Banks?

Ellen Brown: Time to Break Up the Too-Big-to-Fail Banks? HPFB.init();

HuffPost's QuickRead... ShareBox.ad = function (tag_id){if ($(tag_id) == undefined) return; if ($(tag_id).innerHTML != '') return;ad_spec = {"zone_info": "huffpost.business/blog;business=1;nickname=ellen-brown;entry_id=764625;alan-grayson=1;financial-reform-bill=1;foreclosuregate=1;kanjorski-amendment=1;mers=1;tarp-ii=1;too-big-to-fail-banks=1","ord": 1287184612,"tile": 3,"width": 300,"height": 250,"el_id": tag_id + "_js","class_name": "ad_block ad_wide top","type": "iframe"}HuffPoUtil.WEDGJE.write(ad_spec, tag_id);};Loading... BIG NEWS:Housing Crisis|Foreclosures|Auto Bailout|Goldman Sachs| Energy Debates| More... | LogoutLog In| Sign Up The Huffington Post October 15, 2010 Front PagePoliticsBusinessMediaEntertainmentComedySportsStyle WorldGreenTechFood TravelLiving ArtsBooks ReligionImpactEducation College NY LA Chicago Denver Blogs

Ellen BrownAuthor, Web of Debt

Posted: October 15, 2010 06:33 PMBIOBecome a FanGet Email AlertsBloggers' Index

Looming losses from ForeclosureGate qualify as the sort of systemic risk warranting the breakup of the too-big-to-fail banks under the Financial Reform Bill.

The new Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) probably didn't expect to have its authority called on quite so soon, but Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) has just put the Kanjorski amendment to the test. The amendment provides that federal regulators can preemptively break up large financial institutions that -- for any reason -- pose a threat to U.S. financial or economic stability. On October 7, in a letter addressed to Timothy Geithner, Shiela Bair, Ben Bernanke, Mary Schapiro, John Walsh (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), Gary Gensler, Ed DeMarco (FHA) and Debbie Matz (National Credit Union Administration), he asked for an emergency task force on foreclosure fraud. He said:

The liability here for the major banks is potentially enormous, and can lead to a systemic risk. Fortunately, the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation includes a resolution process for these banks.

Grayson sought a foreclosure moratorium on all mortgages originated and securitized between 2005-2008, until such time as the FSOC task force was able to understand and mitigate the systemic risk posed by the foreclosure fraud crisis. He wrote:

The banks didn't keep good records, and there is good reason to believe in many if not virtually all cases during this period, failed to transfer the notes, which is the borrower IOUs in accordance with the requirements of their own pooling and servicing agreements. As a result, the notes may be put out of eligibility for the trust under New York law, which governs these securitizations. Potential cures for the note may, according to certain legal experts, be contrary to IRS rules governing REMICs. As a result, loan servicers and trusts simply lack standing to foreclose. The remedy has been foreclosure fraud, including the widespread fabrication of documents.

There are now trillions of dollars of securitizations of these loans in the hands of investors. The trusts holding these loans are in a legal gray area, as the mortgage titles were never officially transferred to the trusts. The result of this is foreclosure fraud on a massive scale, including foreclosures on people without mortgages or who are on time with their payments. [Emphasis added.]

Why Wasn't It Done Right in the First Place?

That raises the question, why were the notes not assigned to the trusts? Grayson says the banks were not interested in repayment; they were just churning loans as fast as they could in order to generate fees. Karl Denninger says, "I believe a big part of why it was not done is that IF it had been done the original paperwork would have been available to the trustee and ultimately the MBS owners, who would have immediately discovered that the representations and warranties as to the quality of the conveyed paper were being wantonly violated." He says, "You can't audit what you don't have."

Both are probably right, yet these explanations seem insufficient. If it were just a matter of negligence or covering up dubious collateral, surely some of the assignments by some of the banks would have been done properly. Why would they all be defective?

The reason the mortgage notes were never assigned may be that there was no party legally capable of accepting the assignments. Securitization was originally set up as a tax dodge; and to qualify for the tax exemption, the conduits between the original lender and the investors could own nothing. The conduits are "special purpose vehicles" set up by the banks, a form of Mortgage Backed Security called REMICs (Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits). They hold commercial and residential mortgages in trust for the investors. They don't own them; they are just trustees.

The problem was nailed in a class action lawsuit recently filed in Kentucky, titled Foster v. MERS, GMAC, et al. (USDC, Western District of Kentucky). The suit claims that MERS and the banks violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a law originally passed to pursue organized crime. Bloomberg quotes Heather Boone McKeever, a Lexington, Kentucky-based lawyer for the homeowners, who said in a phone interview, "RICO comes in because the fraud didn't just happen piecemeal. This is organized crime by people in suits, but it is still organized crime. They created a very thorough plan."

The complaint alleges:

53. The "Trusts" coming to Court are actually Mortgage Backed Securities ("MBS"). The Servicers, like GMAC, are merely administrative entities which collect the mortgage payments and escrow funds. The MBS have signed themselves up under oath with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC,") and the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS,") as mortgage asset "pass through" entities wherein they can never own the mortgage loan assets in the MBS. This allows them to qualify as a Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit ("REMIC") rather than an ordinary Real Estate Investment Trust ("REIT"). As long as the MBS is a qualified REMIC, no income tax will be charged to the MBS. For purposes of this action, "Trust" and MBS are interchangeable. . . .

56. REMICS were newly invented in 1987 as a tax avoidance measure by
Investment Banks. To file as a REMIC, and in order to avoid one hundred percent
(100%) taxation by the IRS and the Kentucky Revenue Cabinet, an MBS REMIC could not engage in any prohibited action. The "Trustee" can not own the assets of the REMIC. A REMIC Trustee could never claim it owned a mortgage loan. Hence, it can never be the owner of a mortgage loan.
57. Additionally, and important to the issues presented with this particular
action, is the fact that in order to keep its tax status and to fund the "Trust" and legally collect money from investors, who bought into the REMIC, the "Trustee" or the more properly named, Custodian of the REMIC, had to have possession of ALL the original blue ink Promissory Notes and original allonges and assignments of the Notes, showing a complete paper chain of title.
58. Most importantly for this action, the "Trustee"/Custodian MUST have the mortgages recorded in the investors name as the beneficiaries of a MBS in the year the MBS "closed." [Emphasis added.]

Only the beneficiaries - the investors who advanced the funds - can claim "ownership." And the mortgages had to have been recorded in the name of the beneficiaries the year the MBS closed. The problem is, who ARE the beneficiaries who advanced the funds? In the securitization market, they come and go. Properties get sold and resold daily. They can be sliced up and sold to multiple investors at the same time. Which investors could be said to have put up the money for a particular home that goes into foreclosure? MBS are divided into "tranches" according to level of risk, typically from AAA to BBB. The BBB investors take the first losses, on up to the AAAs. But when the REMIC is set up, no one knows which homes will default first. The losses are taken collectively by the pool as they hit; the BBBs simply don't get paid. But the "pool" is the trust; and to qualify as a REMIC trust, it can own nothing.

The lenders were trying to have it both ways; and to conceal what was going on, they dropped an electronic curtain over their sleight of hand, called Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems or "MERS." MERS is simply an electronic data base. On its website and in assorted court pleadings, it too declares that it owns nothing. It was set up that way so that it would be "bankruptcy-remote," something required by the credit rating agencies in order to turn the mortgages passing through it into highly rated securities that could be sold to investors. According to the MERS website, it was also set up that way to save on recording fees, which means dodging state statutes requiring a fee to be paid to establish a formal record each time title changes hands.

The arrangement satisfied the ratings agencies, but it has not satisfied the courts. Real estate law dating back hundreds of years requires that to foreclose on real property, the foreclosing party must produce signed documentation establishing a chain of title to the property; and that has not been done. Increasingly, judges are holding that if MERS owns nothing, it cannot foreclose, and it cannot convey title by assignment so that the trustee for the investors can foreclose. MERS breaks the chain of title so that no one has standing to foreclose.

Sixty-two million mortgages are now held in the name of MERS, a ploy that the banks have realized won't work; so Plan B has been to try to fabricate documents to cure the defect. Enter the RoboSigning crew, who signed hundreds of documents a day without knowing what was in them. Interestingly, it wasn't just one bank engaging in this pattern of coverup and fraud but many banks, suggesting the sort of "organized crime" that would qualify under the RICO statute.

However, that ploy won't work either, because it's too late to assign properties to trusts that have already been set up without violating the tax code for REMICs, and the trusts themselves aren't allowed to own anything under the tax code. If the trusts violate the tax laws, the banks setting them up will owe millions of dollars in back taxes. Whether the banks are out the real estate or the taxes, they could well be looking at insolvency, posing the sort of serious systemic risk that would bring them under the purview of the new Financial Stability Oversight Council.

Follow Ellen Brown on Twitter:www.twitter.com/ellenhbrown

Related News On Huffington Post:
Top Bank Regulator Doesn't Believe Consumers Harmed By Foreclosure Fraud Scandal Wells Fargo 'Robo Signers' Apparently Used In Foreclosures Wells Fargo WON'T Halt Foreclosures Despite Evidence That Servicers Didn't Read Paperwork Foreclosures No Harm?

Top Bank Regulator Doesn't Believe Consumers Harmed By Foreclosure Fraud Scandal

The nation's top bank regulator doesn't believe homeowners are being harmed directly by an ongoing foreclosure fraud scandal, despite multiple reports of banks mistakenly evicting... Wells Fargo Robo Signers

Wells Fargo 'Robo Signers' Apparently Used In Foreclosures

With one out of every 245 Minnesota housing units in foreclosure during September, news has broken that Wells Fargo, along with other big banks, may... Wells Fargo Foreclosures

Wells Fargo WON'T Halt Foreclosures Despite Evidence That Servicers Didn't Read Paperwork

WASHINGTON — Wells Fargo & Co. does not plan to halt foreclosures despite an employee's testimony that she signed up to 500 foreclosure documents daily... Around the Web:

Ohio AG to Ally: Stop foreclosure sales

Investor fears grow over foreclosure mess

Foreclosure postings fall in Bexar County

BofA projects 30000 foreclosures to stop

So you bought a foreclosed home. Now what?

Md. judiciary eyes expanded power in foreclosures

Is There Any Political Fix to the Foreclosure Mess?

Avoid Foreclosure Market Until the Dust Settles

Foreclosure Crisis Shakes the Dow, S&P; NASDAQ Boosted By Google

Share Your Foreclosure Purchase War Stories

More in Business...

One Man's HAMP HELL: 'Just Wait This...

The Biggest Landowners In America: The Land...

Wells Fargo WON'T Halt Foreclosures Despite Evidence...

Job-Creation Idea No. 10: A Lower Dollar... function returnCommentDetails(params) {// this is the proxy method. just proxyreturn CommentsSharer.getHoveredCommentDetails(params);};function callback_for_loaded_Badges(params) {//console.log("callback_for_loaded_Badges() called");CommentsSharer.badge_object = params.badge_object; // not actualy used, by could be usefulCommentsSharer.badge_holder_id = params.badge_holder_id; // not actualy used, by could be useful}diggstumbleredditdel.ico.usCommentsSharer.initBadgeBox("comment_share_popup"); Comments 1 Pending Comments 0 View FAQ

Login or connect with: More Login OptionsLogin with: Google Account Huffpost Account Yahoo AccountYou must be logged in to comment.Post CommentPreview CommentTo reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.

Share your Comment:

Post to Facebook.Post to Blogger.Post to Twitter.Post to WordPress.Post to TypePad.Post to Tumblr.Post to Yahoo! View All Recency | Popularity Duppy 5 minutes ago (6:49 PM) 222 Fans Big banks caused our economy to collapse. They should be replaced with new institutions. I say, let them all go down. Duppy: Big banks caused our economy to collapse. They should be http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Duppy/time-to-break-up-the-toob_b_764625_63856905.html Permalink | Share it New comments on this entry — Click to refresh

Loading comments… Loading twitter module...

Most Popular on HuffPost1D6W1lj5M6WK9G8HrrNmPpYjwnutIsA46NL64OmpEOjb1lq3M1nnXYWa6ECwo6MFwd4UUa6QM7AOal8lrn%2F%2Bqg%3D%3DCvAnOteXEp223IerqcDhw5BVOrc3vXju10iC2cbJapU6B2b9At1Mehxd811XYmevufj2NYDUK4t5ioYQbg4maQ%3D%3D1 of 2 Joy Whoopi Walk Off

Whoopi, Joy Walk Off 'The View' After Heated Fight With O'Reilly
14,190 Comments Gavin Rossdale Gay Affair

Gavin Rossdale Admits To Gay Fling
1,168 Comments

Helen Thomas Cries, Calls Obama 'Reprehensible'
5,724 Comments Gambling

11 Freedoms That Drunks, Slackers, Prostitutes And Pirates Pioneered
254 Comments

Michael P. McDonald Early Voting Off to a Fast Start in...
2,182 Comments Traffic

'Suburban Nation'
286 Comments Christine Odonnell

WATCH: Christine O'Donnell Stumped, Can't Name A Recent SCOTUS Decision She Disagrees With
15,220 Comments Jennifer Aniston Joan Collins

Jennifer Aniston's Camp Responds To Joan Collins' Insults
1,332 Comments Npr Rallies

NPR Bans Employees From Stewart, Colbert Rallies
8,144 Comments Don't Miss HuffPost Bloggers1 of 5

Bishop Gene Robinson How Religion Is Killing Our Most Vulnerable Youth

Robin Quivers Nutty for Nutrition

Rev. Jesse Jackson GOP Runs on the "Big Lie"

Dan Rather Help Not Wanted?

Bernard-Henri Lévy Sakineh’s Son Arrested: The Great Silence of Conformist Thinkers

Henry Louis Gates, Jr. Faces of America: Mehmet Oz and the Immigrant Story Pedigree

Al Gore Standing Up Against the Oil Lobby, in California and Beyond

Alec Baldwin Waiting for "Superman": A Monumentally Important Film

Melinda Gates Why We Tell Success Stories (VIDEO)

Ted Danson A Pacific Gem, ProtectedHot Trends bosses day 2010 electric cars foreclosure crisis foreclosure fraud wells fargo robo signers #ad_most_pop_234x60_req_wrapper {border:1px solid #cccccc;margin-bottom:10px;padding:30px 22px 10px;background-color:#ffffff;background-image:url('/images/slug_most_popular.gif');background-repeat:no-repeat;background-position:center 10px} Follow Huffington Post

Today's MarketsLoading..S&P 500NASDAQNYSEGainersLosersMost ActiveSEARCH WIKINVEST POWERED BY

Wikinvest data is provided as-is, delayed, and subject to Terms TOP VIDEO PICKS1 of 5

Foreclosure Freeze: Home Values at Risk

Private equity eyeing Yahoo

Foreclosure "Robo-Signers" Unqualified?

Joe Lieberman Could Be Kingmaker In 50-50 SenateJoe Lieberman Play

Disabled Students In The Spotlight Thanks To Theater ProgramVolunteering Geithner

The Washington Post's TARP Mythmaking, A Recent HistoryWash Post

Top Bank Regulator Doesn't Believe Consumers Harmed By Foreclosure Fraud ScandalForeclosures

Kim Zolciak's Wardrobe Malfunction (VIDEO)The Real Housewives Dennis Hopper Compound

Dennis Hopper Estate's Big Price ReductionLA Real Estate Ike Texas

Obama To Press For Stimulus Payments For SeniorsEconomy Test Drive Honda

Honda Recalls Brazil Compact Cars For Faulty PedalsAuto Bailout North Korea Celebrations

HuffPost Lightbox

View the original article here

Croobert News

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Ellen Brown: Time to Break Up the Too-Big-to-Fail Banks?

No comments:

Post a Comment